Interesting data, thanks for that!
I have a question about the section "Are active players versatile or specialised?". If for example someone plays one game of bullet and one game of rapid, they would be included in the squares (2,4) and (4,2) of figure 3, correct?
If so I think it would be interesting to create the same matrix with B only including players who play a certain TC the most (measured by no idea what, maybe just number of games) and looking at how many of them also play other TCs. That way each player only shows up in one square and you can maybe see what TC leads to the most variety and which one is the most specialized.
As it is right now I feel like we can not see if playing less popular TCs leads to those players also playing in mainstream ones or the other way around. So if we get to request something for part 2, that is my wish :)
Thanks again for your work!
I have a question about the section "Are active players versatile or specialised?". If for example someone plays one game of bullet and one game of rapid, they would be included in the squares (2,4) and (4,2) of figure 3, correct?
If so I think it would be interesting to create the same matrix with B only including players who play a certain TC the most (measured by no idea what, maybe just number of games) and looking at how many of them also play other TCs. That way each player only shows up in one square and you can maybe see what TC leads to the most variety and which one is the most specialized.
As it is right now I feel like we can not see if playing less popular TCs leads to those players also playing in mainstream ones or the other way around. So if we get to request something for part 2, that is my wish :)
Thanks again for your work!