lichess.org
Donate

If you were a Chess Piece, Which Piece Would you be?

In my psychology course, I heard some chess-related theory from a colleague and I'd like to know if anyone has some kind of source. It's regarding which piece you like better, according to how you discuss matters. This colleague was able to predict with certain precision how someone he had just met would play a chess game. It's roughly like this:

- Pawns are arguments, small points that you keep pushing.
- Bishop is the belief, dogmatic and escapes diagonally.
- Knight is the desire, bestial and hardest to predict.
- Rook is the denial, cuts the field and hits directly.
- Queen is the opinion, strong and imposing, but easily threatened.
[Edit: an argument may become an opinion if it's pushed and sustained far enough.]

As for me, I'd say the rook represents me better.
looks like the bot came up with the most insightful response thus far

EDIT: including mine as well ;)
I would be a bishop because I like to play soccer and find those creative angles. When you look two or three moves ahead where you can snipe someone, pin a piece, or get someone skewer.
A pawn who is about to get promoted to a knight (**keeping my cock**)

Then guys (rocks, knights, kings and the bitch ceirsei, bishops are mentaly retarded), sacrifice yoursef so my dream could come true. :D

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.